Col. of Charleston
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,526  Crew Kosiorek SO 34:32
1,735  Colton Hennessey SO 34:53
2,124  Joshua Tierney JR 35:35
2,155  Tyler Wood SR 35:39
2,350  Grant Gauthier FR 36:11
2,411  Nicolaus Putnam JR 36:20
2,500  Andrew Tyler JR 36:36
2,666  Logan Veatch FR 37:21
National Rank #237 of 308
Southeast Region Rank #31 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Crew Kosiorek Colton Hennessey Joshua Tierney Tyler Wood Grant Gauthier Nicolaus Putnam Andrew Tyler Logan Veatch
Charlotte Invitational 09/25 1319 34:34 35:14 35:41 35:50 35:46 37:09 36:19 37:18
Royals Challenge 10/09 1317 34:27 34:51 35:31 36:31 35:59 36:07 36:58 38:03
College of Charleston Classic Invitational 10/16 1318 34:44 35:28 35:30 35:29 35:57 35:54 37:08
CAA Championship 10/31 1305 34:16 34:40 35:19 35:44 37:23 36:21 36:38 37:12
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 1337 35:12 34:40 36:42 35:03 36:26 37:36 37:38





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 32.0 956 0.0 0.1 1.1 4.2 8.2 10.1 15.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Crew Kosiorek 154.2
Colton Hennessey 171.0
Joshua Tierney 198.9
Tyler Wood 201.3
Grant Gauthier 224.4
Nicolaus Putnam 232.3
Andrew Tyler 242.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 1.1% 1.1 27
28 4.2% 4.2 28
29 8.2% 8.2 29
30 10.1% 10.1 30
31 15.0% 15.0 31
32 18.1% 18.1 32
33 21.5% 21.5 33
34 12.2% 12.2 34
35 5.9% 5.9 35
36 2.7% 2.7 36
37 0.7% 0.7 37
38 0.1% 0.1 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0